Wondering how to post images or maybe change your avatar or maybe something else?
You can find that and a lot of other useful tips for using the forums in the HydrostreamForums Knowledge Base.

To visit the HydrostreamForums Knowledge Base CLICK HERE

Thunderstream email from Dave Packard

The place for all general Hydrostream discussions.
User avatar

Topic Author
Andyhydro
Regular
Regular
Posts: 135
Joined: Jun 08, 2011 9:00 pm
Location: Ontario Canada
Contact:

Thunderstream email from Dave Packard

Post: # 10089Post Andyhydro »

Hey guys thought this might be interesting to those like myself leaning towards longevity in the newer boat/ Optimax engines. This email deals with horsepower, torque and weight regarding the new Thundermist Thunderstream modeled after the Vking.

Not having the time to race around the states (as I am from Canada, this is indeed an en-devour dealing with border fees, travel ect..) buying packages and trailers just for the engines and then having to try and sell a used boat and trailer with no engine= too much hassle, I am more interested in newer engines direct from marinas or factories whos stock is usually Optimax no older than 2006. At least this is how it seems to be in my neck of the woods. Please correct me if I'm wrong:)

I was pleasantly surprised after some emails with Dave Packard from Thundermist boats regarding my concern for weight, torque and horse power on his new boat. He was very professional and cautious with his wording- which is completely understandable as he has to answer to the Coast Guard and insurance companies.

"I appreciate your interest. Heres the thing about the transoms: we build them much the same we do for much larger boats. As such, they can handle damn near any engine made to day from the perspective of the boat. What I mean is the engine or engine power will not harm or damage the boat itself. What is the problem, from our perspective as well as the CG, is the larger engines make the boat unsafe to operate. The more power, the more unpredictable the boat becomes as you go faster and accelerate quicker, etc. This is why the CG rates the boats the way they do. All of us(CG, us, and the Insurance
carrier) are most interested in one thing; making sure no one dies on one of our boats. I can assure you the CG and Insurance company could care less how fast the boat goes, as long as no one ever gets hurt. I hope this fleshes out for you."

Would love some of you pros to weigh in on this...am I crazy to put a 200/225 Pro XS or straight Optimax on my new Thundermist? Getting to the point- some of you have weighed in on this topic of mine and I have seen comments that say nooo waay tooo heavy and some that have said the new boats are built heavier and it will be fine! Hope this new info can make it a more black and white issue. :)
User avatar

RussF
HSF Lifetime Supporter
HSF Lifetime Supporter
Posts: 1388
Joined: Apr 17, 2009 12:41 pm
Location: New Hampshire
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 20 times
Contact:

Re: Thunderstream email from Dave Packard

Post: # 10090Post RussF »

Are you having a Thunderstream built by them
User avatar

Topic Author
Andyhydro
Regular
Regular
Posts: 135
Joined: Jun 08, 2011 9:00 pm
Location: Ontario Canada
Contact:

Re: Thunderstream email from Dave Packard

Post: # 10092Post Andyhydro »

Yes I am, within the next year or so
User avatar

Topic Author
Andyhydro
Regular
Regular
Posts: 135
Joined: Jun 08, 2011 9:00 pm
Location: Ontario Canada
Contact:

Re: Thunderstream email from Dave Packard

Post: # 10096Post Andyhydro »

Any tips concerning the customizing process/ tips regarding the boat performance?
User avatar

RussF
HSF Lifetime Supporter
HSF Lifetime Supporter
Posts: 1388
Joined: Apr 17, 2009 12:41 pm
Location: New Hampshire
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 20 times
Contact:

Re: Thunderstream email from Dave Packard

Post: # 10103Post RussF »

I own the 1st Thunderstream they made but they made maybe 6 Minx s before the Thunderstream for another vendor
User avatar

Hippie459MN
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3969
Joined: Mar 25, 2009 7:31 pm
Location: Nowthen, MN
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 80 times
Contact:

Re: Thunderstream email from Dave Packard

Post: # 10104Post Hippie459MN »

-Kevin
Project Vulture | Project Vector | Project Vamp | Project Vixen
The Vulture Wish List | Project CobraJet

1977 HydroStream Vulture - Worlds longest ongoing project. :eek:
1982 Hydrostream Vector
1982 Hydrostream Vamp
1973 Hydrostream Vixen
1976 CobraJet Jet Boat - Outboard conversion project
1976 Pontoon - aka The Family Truckster
User avatar

Topic Author
Andyhydro
Regular
Regular
Posts: 135
Joined: Jun 08, 2011 9:00 pm
Location: Ontario Canada
Contact:

Re: Thunderstream email from Dave Packard

Post: # 10108Post Andyhydro »

How does it handle Russ? Any chance we can get a video of it this summer?
User avatar

transomstand
Hydrostream Addict
Hydrostream Addict
Posts: 420
Joined: Apr 07, 2009 6:50 pm
Location: Fairfield, CT
Been thanked: 9 times
Contact:

Re: Thunderstream email from Dave Packard

Post: # 10132Post transomstand »

Andyhydro wrote: within the next year or so
So you must have ordered it last year :roll:
transomstand
Original owner 1975 Ventura II SE
User avatar

RussF
HSF Lifetime Supporter
HSF Lifetime Supporter
Posts: 1388
Joined: Apr 17, 2009 12:41 pm
Location: New Hampshire
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 20 times
Contact:

Re: Thunderstream email from Dave Packard

Post: # 10138Post RussF »

transomstand wrote: So you must have ordered it last year :roll:
all I can say Pete is LOLOLOL
User avatar

Topic Author
Andyhydro
Regular
Regular
Posts: 135
Joined: Jun 08, 2011 9:00 pm
Location: Ontario Canada
Contact:

Re: Thunderstream email from Dave Packard

Post: # 10141Post Andyhydro »

Like I said, Within the next year or so....gonna take a while to get the proper funding. :lol:
Last edited by Andyhydro on Jul 20, 2011 7:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply

  • Random Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests